对于备考托福考试的同学来说，写作是不能忽略的一部分，考生要多参考范文，进行一些认真的训练。下面是为大家整理的两篇2017托福写作真题作文范文，欢迎大家参考。2017托福写作真题作文范下面是小编为大家整理的托福写作真题作文范本【完整版】,供大家参考。
对于备考托福考试的同学来说，写作是不能忽略的一部分，考生要多参考范文，进行一些认真的训练。下面是为大家整理的两篇2017托福写作真题作文范文，欢迎大家参考。
2017托福写作真题作文范文一
In the lecture, by claiming that the prescribed burning is not as harmful as it is in the reading, the professor refutes the three points mentioned in the passage.
Firstly, the reading holds that the prescribed burning is a menace to animals, especially newborn animals. However, the professor refutes that the time of burning can be planned to avoid the breeding season, so that there will be few young animals and the adult animals can run faster to escape from the fire, what’s more, the burning will not spread so fast, which gives animals enough time to run away.
Secondly, the reading claims that prescribed burning is detrimental to environment by producing smoke and carbon dioxide. The professor disagrees with this by suggesting that the vegetation in the forest can absorb carbon dioxide by photosynthesis, and more vegetation should be planted to enhance that effect.
Finally, in the reading passage, it indicates that prescribed burning might cause natural fires, increasing the time, money and resources spent. In contrast, the professor holds that the original aim of prescribed burning is to burn down the branches or dead trees that can lead to forest fire, after which the aftermath of natural fires will not be so severe.
2017托福写作真题作文范文二
The reading appeals to the view that establishing a fund to make regular payments for forests is a plausible suggestion for it can protect environment. However, the professor refutes the three benefits mentioned in the reading.
Firstly, the reading holds that such suggestion can reduce agricultural damage by preventing farmers from using forests as farmlands for agriculture. The professor disagrees with this by suggesting that if forests are not allowed to be transformed into farmlands, food will be deficient. In order to generate more food, intensive technology will be used, thus aggravating damage to environment.
Secondly, by illustrating the fact that local governments and landlords who are not forest villagers will first receive the payment, the professor refutes the reading’s claim that the payment can improve the forest habitants’ lives.
Finally, in the reading passage, it explains that the plan can promote biopersity. In contrast, the professor holds that biopersity will not be improved because the payment will be used for plantation forest, man-made one, in which only trees of great commercial use will be planted. For example, in some plantation forests only tung trees and walnut trees grow.
